Comments on: Christopher Hitchens and Tony Jones 10 of 11 , 07 October 2009 10:00

By: Widukinn

Widukinn — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:32:40 +0000

First of all, let us reach an agreement on what is considered a religion? Otherwise, its way to easy for beleivers to confuse due to semantics. However, the fact they have to to this proves they themselves actually do not beleive in what they wants others to beleive. All religion has been made up by humans and is practiced by humans. Nothing divine about it.

By: Salmo77

Salmo77 — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:15:28 +0000

Useless religious crackpot prick. Get a brain.

By: MrProgressivelib1

MrProgressivelib1 — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:47:27 +0000

Well, you’ve proven that you have at least a 2nd grade education. I have one, and I, at least, know how to how to use it.

By: MrProgressivelib1

MrProgressivelib1 — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:52:44 +0000

All I see on here are idle threats of perceived superiority, and NO proof of that superiority. You cannot disprove God anymore than I can prove Him. Just be honest enough to admit you are as closed-minded as you claim believers are, and next time, please punctuate correctly. Otherwise, you have no intellectual credibility with me.

By: MrProgressivelib1

MrProgressivelib1 — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:36:35 +0000

They cannot account for the origin of the singularitry, or the first 3 minutes(a manmade unit by the way). I took several physics classes, and understand plenty. I will admit that I have not pursued much interest in the last three years, so if there has been a new discovery, I’d be happy to look into it. There is no stick. And atheism is a religion.

By: Sylosis333

Sylosis333 — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:12:32 +0000

Yes, they have theories of of the origin of the singularity. You obviously want me to pull it out of my pocket and show it to you because your religion causes you to assume you have an innate reason to know how it happened. There obviously is a stick and your at the short end of it. You call something based on theories that for the most part can be proven in labs and by satelites a religion. Your introductory education in physics obviously didn’t go to deep into relativity now did it?

By: Sylosis333

Sylosis333 — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:46:03 +0000

You can look up the multiverse theory if you would like. I’m sure you will say oh that’s just a theory but so is god. At least physicists are trying to prove the theory and will drop it if they find it’s not the most likely answer. Again your blind faith will only tell you that something unlikely should always be the most likely answer. Again you’re at the short end of the stick. Do you call medicine a religion when you take it when you’re sick?

By: Sylosis333

Sylosis333 — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:44:18 +0000

Obviously from the context of your comments you don’t understand what a singularity is. THE singularity infers that you think there is only one. Black holes are singularities and are part of what keeps our galaxy from being a chaotic mess. Without black holes we could not exist. Neutron stars collapse due to carbon shell cooling breaking the schwartzchild radius and colapsing space time. This also pertains to the multiverse theory that the other end of the black whole is a white hole (universe)

By: Sylosis333

Sylosis333 — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:38:33 +0000

Religion is a thing of faith and worship. If science were a religion we would still be worshipping einstein’s theories. we wouldn’t believe in accelerated inflation or weakly interactive massive particles.

By: Sylosis333

Sylosis333 — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:00:17 +0000

You claim god can’t be disproven and that is why science is not a religion. In introductory physics you might learn that the light we see projected from other galaxies actually predates the estimated creation of the earth in the bible. unless the universe is an illusion made by god there is no other way to explain this.