“Making a Messiah, Part 1: What do we know about the NT authors?” by www.youtube.com The first part in a new video series, exploring the role the New Testament authors played in shaping the character of Jesus Christ into their vision of the Jewish messiah. 2. Old Testament interpretation: www.youtube.com 3. Messiah who missed the mark: www.youtube.com 4. The not-so-good news: www.youtube.com 5. Sacrifice denied: www.youtube.com 6. The second coming – coming soon! www.youtube.com 7. Was Jesus a false prophet? www.youtube.com 8. Disciples who suffered and died for a lie: www.youtube.com — Subscribe to Science & Reason: • www.youtube.com • www.youtube.com • www.youtube.com • www.youtube.com • www.youtube.com .
On June 30, 2010, In Uncategorized, by admin
“Making a Messiah, Part 1: What do we know about the NT authors?” by www.youtube.com The first part in a new video series, exploring the role the New Testament authors played in shaping the character of Jesus Christ into their vision of the Jewish messiah. 2. Old Testament interpretation: www.youtube.com 3. Messiah who missed the [...]
If you enjoyed this article, please consider sharing it!
@DubbleLzNhell
“If there is no understanding of G-d, death seems scary and undeserved from a general human perspective.? ”
Thanks for eloquently stating exactly why man invented God – comfort from the fear of death.
c’td… If bad happens to me so that I may learn to be TRULY good, so be it. With thoughts amongst the “how could this happen?” rhetoric, even actions or events perceived as evil, wrong, or undeserving are mere necessitations contributing to the end. This more than justifies the means in the world’s particular case. And there’s nothing like divine justice. If there is no understanding of G-d, death seems scary and undeserved from a general human perspective.
G-d is perfect and consistent. Even the ways we perceive and understand the word ‘perfection’ pales to G-d’s total understanding of the word. He is the author of all.
Hi do you have a website where I can get printed pages of your work?
I like how Bachs Air is playing in the background.
Heard your first video. seems clear and professionaly done.
Olla
The point made in this video pretty much hits the nail on the head of the point I made in my newest video. Always glad to see others thinking along the same line.
Does anyone else think the guy doing the voice-over sounds like the kid in family guy?
One particular statement; what I want to obtain. Which is why I asked why you believed that a statement of personal goals, which you asked for, required a reference. Clearly a misunderstanding.
However if you want to discuss references on any of the factual statements I have made, I am more than happy to do so, just ask specifically which, that way we can avoid any confusion regarding applicability of references regarding answers to personal questions.
So your statements are matter of opinion? Got it. You’re entitled to your opinion.
“References do apply. It shows your true knowledge of the subject.”
References apply to “true knowledge” of which subject? Since I have not referred to something, but made a statement of my own desires, how is this referring to a subject?
“Whether you got this informatin on your own”
Of course I got my personal statement of what I am seeking to obtain from myself, its not possible to come from anyone else. When you tell me you want a holiday, where do you get that statement from? Dawkins?
I’ll check him out this weekend thanks.
Don’t worry about it. Check out AronRa’s Foundational Falsehoods of Creationism series. Don’t let the word Creationist throw you off. It’s not about a god falsehood or even religion, it’s about the small percentage that got science wrong.
Sounds pretty simple. I’ve spent the better part of the last 2 months arguing something I really didn’t know much about. Crazy huh. Thanks for the information. Lesson learned.
Right, Almost like a wolf to a small breed of dog, and eventually the dog won’t be able to breed with the ancestor wolf and is thus known as speciation.
That’s all. no big leaps, just small changes that accumulat over time.
I should have clarified that I was just kidding about the debate police bit. So many you tubers take this stuff too seriously.
Ok let me open my mind here a little bit. Evolution entails a gradual transition of species right?
Debate police. LOL No, just trying to get that one out of the way.
You say won’t believe it till you see it.
What do you need to see. A dog giving birth to a cat? How about a crockoduck? What would it take?
“You better not come back at me with a “no true Scotsman fallacy”, because I won’t have it. ”
What are you the debate police? Let’s not forget who attacked who. I’ll believe in Evolution when I see it. As atheists say they’ll believe in God when they see him.
“Evolution in no way disproves the existence of God.”
Of course not, no one ever said it could, other than some folks who like to build straw men.
The notion is silly. It’s so silly, some evolutionists have made several parodies mimicking that straw man, which just goes to show how ludicrous that idea really is.
The majority of Christians accept evolution and that’s a fact. You better not come back at me with a “no true Scotsman fallacy”, because I won’t have it.
you need to learn what the Theory of Evolution is, it has nothing to do with disproving God. It is about descent with modification. Evolution has more than just fossils for proof, where have you been? Genetics, Anatomy, Geology, 100s of thousands of peer reviewed papers with evidence. AND it won 3 court cases vs Creationism and ID, where judges looked at the evidence and ruled it was a Science and the other two NOT. educate yourself.
References do apply. It shows your true knowledge of the subject. Whether you got this informatin on your own or you’re just going by something Richard Dawkins told you. Good to see there are still some independent thinkers in the world.
I didn’t tell you the rump ranger hates US military. Fossils are dead animals. They prove nothing.
AS you’ll believe in God when you see him, I’ll believe in Evolution when I see it. Evolution in no way disproves the existence of God.
“Translation of your comment.”
No translation required, I said exactly what I meant. I know you are used to asserting your own subjective bias onto texts you read, but that’s not required in this circumstance.
I provide no reference, since I have not referred to anything, something which anyone with half a brain would realise is essential to the applicability of a reference.
If you disagree explain how a reference applies to my direct statement of what I am seeking to obtain?
05:10 They’re gonna make out! Companions Indeed!